Task Part 1 After having read the opening and closing overviews and the articles by both authors related to the Canadian Charter of Rights by both authors, briefly answer the following questions: Question1: What is the central argument of each of the authors? Question2: What is the nature of the disagreement between the two authors? Is it objective (e.g. fact-based) or normative (e.g. value based?) If the former, what facts/evidence are in question? If the latter, what are the value differences between the two and is there any way to resolve the disagreement? Question3: Which argument is more compelling? Are they equally compelling? Equally in convincing?